🔗 Share this article

One Monday afternoon in the end of September, Zoe Rosenberg exited a courtroom in Santa Rosa, California. Surrounded by her legal team, she hurried through the court building's passages, beyond dozens of potential jurors.

Attached to her black blazer was a tiny silver chicken, glinting on the lapel.

These were the concluding moments of picking jurors for the case against Rosenberg. She stood accused of two misdemeanor charges for unauthorized entry and one for tampering with a vehicle, as well as one count of felony conspiracy. If the verdict goes against her, she could face up to four and a half years in prison.

It’s not a whodunit … It’s a whydunit.

The facts at the center of the trial were not in dispute. In the early hours on 13 June 2023, Rosenberg and several other members of the collective the activist network drove to a slaughterhouse facility, a processing center about a short drive north of the city. Disguised as workers, they encountered a truck filled with countless poultry crammed in containers. They took four birds, put them in containers and left the scene.

These details were agreed because Rosenberg and her fellow activists had later published film clips of the incident. “The identity isn't in question,” her attorney, Carraway, frequently remarks. “It’s a whydunit.”

Following their exit, the rescuers checked the poultry – that they dubbed four named hens - more thoroughly. She stated they were splattered with diarrhea and experiencing cuts and scrapes.

The lawyer argued in court that Zoe's purpose was not to commit theft but to provide assistance. The jury members would be asked to determine, practically, the limits of compassion before it turns illegal.

---

As the child of an animal doctor, She spent her childhood on 16 hectares in San Luis Obispo county, CA, in the company of various pets and farm animals.

At age nine, the household acquired back-yard chickens. She recalls easily their identities effortlessly: the seven chickens. Until then, She held the widespread belief that poultry weren't intelligent, but observing them closely changed her views. “It became clear they have individual traits and that they’re so smart and curious, and that they possess great worth.”

Two years later, She saw an internet clip of protesters accessing a large poultry operation in overseas and rescuing hens. It was the first time witnessed a factory farm, and she was shocked by the conditions: numerous poultry confined in enclosures. It was also her introduction to the notion of publicized rescues, the phrase employed by advocates to describe operations in which they access commercial farms or scientific centers and remove animals they deem to be in distress. They publicize their actions, often posting footage of what they do.

Once she saw it, Rosenberg immediately knew that this was her calling, and she contacted the leader of the activist collective. (“My youth was unknown,” Rosenberg recalled.) Subsequently, in 2015, she established the San Luis Obispo chapter of DxE, a emerging advocacy group.

Over the years, activist collectives have gained a reputation for using direct actions – like efforts from the group linking animal products to tragic events or publicity grabs using fake blood. The reasoning is straightforward: a jolt is needed to shake societal indifference about livestock pain. But the result is often the opposite: turning people off. Where meat consumption is standard, numerous view these actions as a personal attack – and feel judged, not persuaded.

They adhere to these methods; they have staged protests at a retail store in Berkeley and interrupted a meal at the renowned dining spot the venue.

Yet, their defining operation has been “open rescues”. In the view of the rescuers, a benefit of this method is that it does not just call attention to an wrongdoing – it attempts, in a small way, to remedy the situation. It aims at the business rather than blaming everyday people, and provides a view into the secret realm of meat production.

“The trials we face are kind of a vehicle to pose the question to a randomly selected jury of our peers, and to others through the media,” said the communications lead, DxE’s communications lead. “Should it be illegal, or is it the right thing to do, to save a creature that is suffering in a factory farm?”

Currently, DxE activists note, there are legal protections for rescuers in CA and numerous states offering immunity if they forcibly enter a motor vehicle to rescue a threatened creature. Their argument is that the same principle should apply to all animals in distress.

Since 2014, as stated by the representative, participants have participated in about 60 such operations. In recent times, rescuers have removed two piglets from a Utah factory farm; a pair of birds from a company truck at a facility in California's Merced; and pets from a breeding and research facility in Wisconsin. Once the creatures are taken, the activists provide them with veterinary care and find them shelters.

---

The proprietor manages his family's farm with his sibling in the city. The farm has been in his family for many decades, he stated. The farm focuses on poultry with a large flock, kept in multiple structures. The business, which is powered by more than 2,500 solar panels, also turns the chickens’ manure into organic fertilizer.

During May of 2018, protesters carried out a large-scale operation on his farm. Numerous protesters gathered to object. A subset stormed on to the property and {broke into a chicken house|accessed a poultry building|entered a coop